Skip to content
  • Overview
  • Curriculum
    • FLUMental maths and numerical fluency
    • COMBCounting and combinatorics
    • PROBProbability
    • GAMEGames, decision theory and puzzles
    • MMMarket making
    • MKTMarkets and products
      • 1Asset classes

        • Asset classes: who trades what, and why it is structured that way
      • 2ETFs and index products

        • ETFs: the arbitrage mechanism, and why leveraged ones decay
      • 3Corporate actions and events

        • Corporate actions: adjustments, dividends and merger arbitrage
      • 4Macro fundamentals

        • Macro: the yield curve, the central bank and the calendar
      • 5Market events to know

        • Market events, and the lesson each one actually taught
      • 6Talking about a trade

        • Pitching a trade: thesis, instrument, sizing, risk, catalyst, exit

Practise

  • Question bank
  • Mental arithmetic
  • Market simulator
  • Arbitrage trees
  • Horse racing
  • Bid book
  • Screening tests
  • Mock papers

Reference

  • Formula reference
  • Search

Your record

  • Review queue
  • Progress
  • Leaderboard
  • Profile
  • Invite friends
AccountSend feedback
  1. Curriculum
  2. /Trading and market making
  3. /Markets and products
  4. /Corporate actions and events

Corporate actions: adjustments, dividends and merger arbitrage

MKT · Chapter 3·12 min read·Asked at Optiver, IMC, Jane Street, Citadel

Assumes ETFs: the arbitrage mechanism, and why leveraged ones decay.

After this lesson you should be able to

  • Adjust a price and an option contract for a split or a dividend.
  • Price a merger spread and say what the probability implied by it is.
  • Explain pin risk and what to do about it.

Corporate actions are where mechanical detail becomes profit and loss. A split changes the quoted price but nothing real; a dividend transfers value out of the stock on a known date; a merger turns a share into a claim on a deal completing. Each has a precise adjustment, and getting it wrong is a real and recurring source of losses.

ActionEffect on the stockEffect on a listed option
2-for-1 splitPrice halves, shares doubleStrike halves, contract size doubles
3-for-2 splitPrice ×2/3\times 2/3×2/3, shares ×3/2\times 3/2×3/2Strike ×2/3\times 2/3×2/3, size ×3/2\times 3/2×3/2
Ordinary dividendPrice drops by the dividend on the ex-dateNo adjustment — it is priced into the forward
Special dividendPrice drops by the amountStrike typically reduced by the dividend
Spin-offPrice falls by the value distributedDeliverable becomes a basket
Cash mergerConverges to the offer priceDeliverable becomes cash; volatility collapses
Table 3.1 · What each action does. The two dividend rows are the ones that catch people. Ordinary dividends are expected and already sit in the option price through the forward; only unexpected special dividends trigger a contract adjustment.

Proposition 3.2

The ex-dividend drop is not a loss

On the ex-date the stock opens lower by roughly the dividend, because a buyer from that morning no longer receives it. Nothing has been destroyed — value has moved from the share price into a cash payment. For an option holder, though, it is entirely real: a call holder receives no dividend and watches the underlying fall, which is why a large dividend can make early exercise of an American call rational.

Holds when

  • Early exercise of an American call is worth considering only when the dividend exceeds the remaining time value.
  • Borrow costs work the same way inside put–call parity, and a hard-to-borrow name behaves like one paying a large dividend.

Equation 3.3

The merger spread

The current price is a probability-weighted blend of the deal completing and the deal failing. Invert it and the market is quoting a completion probability.

Pnow≈p Pdeal+(1−p) PbreakP_{\text{now}} \approx p\,P_{\text{deal}} + (1-p)\,P_{\text{break}}Pnow​≈pPdeal​+(1−p)Pbreak​
PdealP_{\text{deal}}Pdeal​
The offer price, discounted for the time to close.
PbreakP_{\text{break}}Pbreak​
Where the stock would trade if the deal collapsed — the hardest input to estimate.

Example 3.4

A target is bid for $50\$50$50 cash and trades at $47\$47$47. You judge it would fall to $35\$35$35 if the deal broke. What completion probability is the market implying?

Show the worked solutionHide the worked solution

Worked solution

  1. Formula
    p=Pnow−PbreakPdeal−Pbreakp = \frac{P_{\text{now}} - P_{\text{break}}}{P_{\text{deal}} - P_{\text{break}}}p=Pdeal​−Pbreak​Pnow​−Pbreak​​
  2. Substitute
    =47−3550−35= \frac{47 - 35}{50 - 35}=50−3547−35​
  3. Solve
    =1215= \frac{12}{15}=1512​
  4. Answer
    p=80%p = 80\%p=80%

Sanity check. The payoff is skewed: $3\$3$3 to gain against $12\$12$12 to lose. At 80%80\%80% the expected value is 0.8×3−0.2×12=00.8 \times 3 - 0.2 \times 12 = 00.8×3−0.2×12=0, which is the definition of the implied probability — and it shows why merger arbitrage is picking up a small premium in front of an occasional large loss.

The rest of this lesson is in Premium

You have read the opening. 10 more sections follow, including 3 worked examples and 3 quick checks.

Start the free 7-day trialSign in

Nothing is charged for 7 days, and you can cancel before then. Or read Arithmetic that survives a clock in full, free.

← ETFs: the arbitrage mechanism, and why leveraged ones decayMacro: the yield curve, the central bank and the calendar →
On this page
  • What each action does
  • The ex-dividend drop is not a loss
  • The merger spread
  • Worked example

QuantMax · 141 lessons · 1342 questions · c5c0caa

  • Premium
  • Arbitrage trees
  • Horse racing
  • Invite friends
  • Account
  • About QuantMax
  • Terms
  • Privacy

Firm names identify publicly reported question patterns and nothing more. QuantMax is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or recruiting for any firm named in the curriculum. Everything you do in lessons and the question bank is kept to your account.