Skip to content
  • Overview
  • Curriculum
    • FLUMental maths and numerical fluency
    • TVMTime value, rates and linear products
    • OPTOptions: fundamentals and arbitrage
    • PRCOption pricing models
    • GRKThe Greeks and hedging
    • VOLVolatility
    • EXOExotics and structured products
      • 1Path-independent exotics

        • Digitals and barriers: why the hedging is the hard part
      • 2Path-dependent exotics

        • Path-dependent exotics: Asians, lookbacks and autocallables
      • 3Multi-asset

        • Multi-asset exotics: baskets, best-of, spreads and quantos
      • 4Hedging exotics

        • Hedging exotics: static replication, and reserving for what you cannot hedge
    • SCStochastic calculus

Practise

  • Question bank
  • Mental arithmetic
  • Market simulator
  • Arbitrage trees
  • Horse racing
  • Bid book
  • Screening tests
  • Mock papers

Reference

  • Formula reference
  • Search

Your record

  • Review queue
  • Progress
  • Leaderboard
  • Profile
  • Invite friends
AccountSend feedback
  1. Curriculum
  2. /Derivatives and options
  3. /Exotics and structured products
  4. /Multi-asset

Multi-asset exotics: baskets, best-of, spreads and quantos

EXO · Chapter 3·12 min read·Asked at Optiver, SIG, Citadel Securities, DRW

Assumes Relative value: dispersion, skew trades and correlation.

After this lesson you should be able to

  • Sign the correlation exposure of each multi-asset structure.
  • Compute the volatility of a spread or a basket.
  • State the quanto adjustment and where its sign comes from.

Add a second underlying and correlation becomes a price input, not just a risk measure. The useful skill is signing the exposure without computing anything: does more correlation make this payoff more or less valuable? That one question sorts out baskets, best-of, spreads and quantos in a sentence each.

StructurePayoffCorrelation exposure
Basket call( Sˉ−K)+(\,\bar{S} - K)^+(Sˉ−K)+Long — more correlation means a more volatile basket
Spread option(S1−S2−K)+(S_1 - S_2 - K)^+(S1​−S2​−K)+Short — correlation damps the spread
Best-of call(max⁡(S1,S2)−K)+(\max(S_1, S_2) - K)^+(max(S1​,S2​)−K)+Short — you want them to diverge
Worst-of put(K−min⁡(S1,S2))+(K - \min(S_1, S_2))^+(K−min(S1​,S2​))+Short — you want one of them to fall
Dispersion (short index, long names)—Short
Table 3.1 · Correlation exposure by structure. The pattern: anything that aggregates the assets is long correlation, and anything that selects between them is short it. That is enough to sign almost any structure you are shown.

Equation 3.2

Basket and spread volatility

A basket adds the cross term; a spread subtracts it. Setting w2=−1w_2 = -1w2​=−1 turns the first into the second, which is the whole distinction.

σbasket2=w12σ12+w22σ22+2w1w2ρσ1σ2\sigma_{\text{basket}}^2 = w_1^2\sigma_1^2 + w_2^2\sigma_2^2 + 2w_1w_2\rho\sigma_1\sigma_2σbasket2​=w12​σ12​+w22​σ22​+2w1​w2​ρσ1​σ2​
+2ρσ1σ2+2\rho\sigma_1\sigma_2+2ρσ1​σ2​
Basket: correlation raises the volatility.
−2ρσ1σ2-2\rho\sigma_1\sigma_2−2ρσ1​σ2​
Spread: correlation lowers it.

Example 3.3

Two assets each with 30%30\%30% volatility and correlation 0.80.80.8. What is the volatility of an equally weighted basket, and of the spread between them?

Show the worked solutionHide the worked solution

Worked solution

  1. Formula
    σ2=w12σ12+w22σ22±2w1w2ρσ1σ2\sigma^2 = w_1^2\sigma_1^2 + w_2^2\sigma_2^2 \pm 2w_1w_2\rho\sigma_1\sigma_2σ2=w12​σ12​+w22​σ22​±2w1​w2​ρσ1​σ2​
  2. Substitute
    σ1=σ2=0.30, ρ=0.8\sigma_1 = \sigma_2 = 0.30, \ \rho = 0.8σ1​=σ2​=0.30, ρ=0.8
  3. Solve
    basket (w=12): 0.0225+0.0225+2(0.25)(0.8)(0.09)=0.081⇒28.5%\text{basket } (w = \tfrac12): \ 0.0225 + 0.0225 + 2(0.25)(0.8)(0.09) = 0.081 \Rightarrow 28.5\%basket (w=21​): 0.0225+0.0225+2(0.25)(0.8)(0.09)=0.081⇒28.5%
  4. spread (w=1,−1): 0.09+0.09−2(0.8)(0.09)=0.036⇒19.0%\text{spread } (w = 1, -1): \ 0.09 + 0.09 - 2(0.8)(0.09) = 0.036 \Rightarrow 19.0\%spread (w=1,−1): 0.09+0.09−2(0.8)(0.09)=0.036⇒19.0%
  5. Answer
    basket 28.5%, spread 19.0%\text{basket } 28.5\%, \ \text{spread } 19.0\%basket 28.5%, spread 19.0%

Sanity check. High correlation barely diversifies the basket — 28.5%28.5\%28.5% against 30%30\%30% — while it collapses the spread from a hypothetical 42.4%42.4\%42.4% at zero correlation down to 19%19\%19%. That asymmetry is why spread options are so much more sensitive to the correlation input than baskets are.

Correlation is the input you cannot observe. Volatilities are implied from liquid options, so they are read off the market. Correlation is not: there is no liquid instrument quoting the correlation between two specific stocks, so it has to be estimated from history or backed out of an index. That makes it the parameter most likely to be wrong, and structures whose value is most sensitive to it — spread options above all — carry a model risk that does not appear in any Greek. Desks reserve against it explicitly rather than pretending the estimate is a price.

The rest of this lesson is in Premium

You have read the opening. 10 more sections follow, including 4 worked examples and 3 quick checks.

Start the free 7-day trialSign in

Nothing is charged for 7 days, and you can cancel before then. Or read Forwards, futures and the cost of carry in full, free.

← Path-dependent exotics: Asians, lookbacks and autocallablesHedging exotics: static replication, and reserving for what you cannot hedge →
On this page
  • Correlation exposure by structure
  • Basket and spread volatility
  • Worked example

QuantMax · 141 lessons · 1342 questions · c5c0caa

  • Premium
  • Arbitrage trees
  • Horse racing
  • Invite friends
  • Account
  • About QuantMax
  • Terms
  • Privacy

Firm names identify publicly reported question patterns and nothing more. QuantMax is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or recruiting for any firm named in the curriculum. Everything you do in lessons and the question bank is kept to your account.