AppliedMultiple choiceFree solution
What is ?
- A, by the ordinary chain rule
- B
- C, with the factor carried through
- D, halving the first-order term
Show the answer and worked solution
Answer: B –
Expand to second order: , so . The extra term survives because rather than vanishing, which is the one fact separating this calculus from the ordinary kind. The factor of one half in the lemma cancels the two from the second derivative, which is where the wrong-by-two answers come from. An immediate consequence is that is a martingale.
Worked solution
- Formula
- Substitute
- Solve
- Answer
Sanity check. The one half in the lemma cancels the two from the second derivative, which is where the wrong-by-two answers come from.
- A. That is ordinary calculus, and it drops exactly the term that makes this subject different.
- B. Correct. The second-order term is , which is why is a martingale.
- C. The one half in Itô’s lemma cancels the two from the second derivative.
- D. The first-order coefficient is , not .
Takeaway: Expand to second order: .
Answer it in practice – your answer is marked and recorded.
Learn the method
Reported in interviews at
More stochastic calculus questions
- A stock follows geometric Brownian motion with drift 8% and volatility 20%.Foundation
- For standard Brownian motion, what is 𝔼[W₄⁴] – the fourth moment at time 4?Applied
- What is 𝔼[e^(0.4W₂)], to four decimal places?Applied
- What is 𝔼[∫₀²Wₛ² ds]?Applied
- What is Var(∫₀¹Wₛ dWₛ)?Applied
- Using the Itô product rule on tWₜ, which identity holds?Applied